Mark Brooks, Partner
A while ago, I was invited to a roundtable hosted by Allies and Morrison to discuss the Building Safety Act (BSA), Building Regulations, and the role of Principal Designer.
The session offered an invaluable forum for discussion with designers, developers, and others involved in the construction of High-Rise Buildings (HRB).
It also reminded me that there’s still so much confusion around the Building Safety Act, and of the value of sharing and discussing how we, as an industry, are rising to this new challenge.
To that end, this is how we at Stace are managing these new regulations.
Certain parts of the BSA apply to all buildings (where building work is being carried out in England). These general duties include:
So, all projects involving new builds, refurbishments, or material changes of use are affected by the BSA in some way.
The most stringent parts of the BSA apply to Higher-Risk Buildings (HRBs), which must meet additional safety, information, and regulatory requirements, including the Gateway process and Accountable Person duties.
A Higher-Risk Building is:
This includes:
However, some buildings are exempt, including:
For the occupation phase, from when the construction is complete and the building can be used, the scope of HRBs widens slightly to include:
The responsibility for ensuring buildings meet the requirements of the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) is shared among several dutyholders, but ultimately the client bears primary responsibility during the design and construction phase.
The Act places a greater focus on accountability, information management, and safety throughout the building’s lifecycle, but for now, let’s concentrate on the design and construction phase.
The Client:
The client (person or organisation commissioning the work) has the overarching legal responsibility to ensure:
The Principal Contractor:
Anyone who manages or carries out building work, is responsible for:
The Principal Designer:
If more than one designer is involved, is responsible for:
These roles must be formally appointed and competent as per the Building (Duty Holders and Competence) (England) Regulations 2023.
The Accountable Person
Often the building owner or management company. For higher-risk residential buildings, the Accountable Person (AP) is legally responsible for:
Principal Accountable Person (PAP)
If multiple accountable persons exist (e.g. different owners for different parts), a Principal Accountable Person must be designated to lead on compliance.
Role, Responsibility, Legal Basis:
Client:
Legal Basis: BSA 2022, Building Regulations 2023
Principal Designer (BSA)
Legal Basis: Building (Duty Holders and Competence) Regulations 2023
Principal Contractor (BSA)
Legal Basis: (Duty Holders and Competence) Regulations 2023
Designers/Contractors
Legal Basis: (Duty Holders and Competence) Regulations 2023
Building Safety Regulator (BSR)
Legal Basis: BSA 2022, Building Act 1984 (amended)
Role, Responsibility, Legal Basis:
Accountable Person (AP)
Legal Basis: BSA 2022
Principal Accountable Person (PAP)
Legal Basis: BSA 2022
Residents
Legal Basis: BSA 2022
BSR
Legal Basis: BSA 2022
The Golden Thread refers to the digital record of building safety information that is:
Which should span the entire life cycle of a building, from design and construction through to occupation and maintenance.
Under the Building Safety Act 2022, the Golden Thread is now legally required for Higher-Risk Buildings (HRBs).
From October 2023 onwards, those responsible (including Principal Designers, Principal Contractors, and the Accountable Person) must create, maintain, and hand over the Golden Thread as part of the Gateway process.
The Golden Thread must:
As of 1 October 2023, there is a statutory requirement for a Principal Designer to be involved in projects that constitute building works, require a building regulation application, and are likely to involve more than one designer.
This role is required to comply with Building Regulations and is separate from the CDM Principal Designer, though in some cases, the same organisation may fulfil both roles.
At Stace, we can act as Principal Designer and Client Advisor, to support in all aspects of the Building Safety Act and Building Regulations, and under CDM Regulations, where we have been providing support since 1994.
Having worked in construction since 1999, I now lead our dedicated in-house Health and Safety Management services team. We have strict governance in place to ensure we can undertake these roles.
For every project, we undertake an assessment process to confirm we have the organisational capability and individual competence for the complexity of the project. Once confirmed, we:
Stages 1-4
Stages 5-6
When retained through the construction phase, we
Buildings are complex, and increasingly mixed in use, meaning this question is not always as straightforward as it might initially seem.
I worked with a client hoping to fit out a small office space within a seven-storey office building. It was initially classified as an HRB, because it was attached to a similar building that contained residential units.
Stace, acting as the Building Regulations Principal Designer (BR PD), was able to demonstrate that the buildings were independent, avoiding the gateway process. This saved the client time and resources, making the project viable.
Projects started before 3 April 2023 can continue under the previous regulations; however, for many it was unclear what needed to happen on completion.
We’ve advised clients that, in these instances, the process remains unchanged, and they don’t need to go through Gateway 3. For them, Building Control must issue a final certificate to ensure the building can be registered on the HRB register. Once registered, the building can be occupied, and a building safety case report must be submitted to the BSR on request.
Getting ahead of this major industry change has not been easy and, with changes still expected regarding the Building Safety Levy, registration of mid-rise buildings, and remediation acceleration, coming together as an industry to discuss, share, and critique how we’re approaching these changes is vital.
What is clear is that collaboration between designers, contractors, and clients must start at a far earlier stage if we want to deliver projects on time and budget, without numerous rounds of BSA approvals.
I’d love to hear what others are doing and look forward to more discussions. As an industry, we need to be better at sharing our practices to overcome and mitigate delays.
Get in touch if you’d like to chat further.